Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1309 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320E - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than FX-8320E - $53.55 vs $178.02
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77118 minutes ago
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |