Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900

FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77118 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77117 minutes ago

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77118 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77117 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1309 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320E - 120 vs 118 FPS
  • Up to 70% cheaper than FX-8320E - $53.55 vs $178.02
  • Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 54 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

118

98.33333333333333%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$178.02

30%

AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77118 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

120

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$53.55

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77117 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

71.9155844155844%

Multi-Core

1680

100%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

100%

Multi-Core

1051

62.55952380952381%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Apr 3rd, 2018
FXCollectionCeleron
VisheraCodenameCoffee Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8
Cores2
8
Threads2
3.2 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.1 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
54 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
31.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.