Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600U outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600U is 1952 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
- Performs up to 185% better in League of Legends than FX-8320E - 157 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600U |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |