Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2589 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $74.82 vs $1070.0
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8320 - 236 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 48 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76697 minutes ago
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |