Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1910 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than FX-8150 - 142 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-8150 - $68.57 vs $82.02
- Up to 75% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8150 - $0.16 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |