Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $82.02 vs $123.59
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 58% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8150 - 368 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8150 - $0.34 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2350 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
368
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$123.59
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $123.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |