Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3843 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $64.03 vs $144.98
- Up to 47% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.41 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8150 - 189 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Buy for $144.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |