Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 276 days older than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $78.02 vs $229.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-2600 - $0.67 vs $1.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8120 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10296 minutes ago
Buy for $229.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |