Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $78.02 vs $405.59
- Up to 34% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.86 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 244% better in Diablo IV than FX-8120 - 313 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
313
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
66%
Price, $
$405.59
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $405.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |