Buy on Amazon
$55
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1595 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $55.0 vs $547.2
- Up to 89% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-7920X - $0.5 vs $4.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6350 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $547.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
