Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1443 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 166 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
