Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3481 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6200 - 207 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E |
| Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
