Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 131 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 14 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
