Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 4300 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 33% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6200 - 269 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 3 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
