Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $29.65 vs $300.15
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9920X - $0.22 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6100 - 181 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
137
75.69060773480662%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
13.253012048192772%
Price, $
$300.15
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |