Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $29.65 vs $379.91
- Up to 90% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-13900K - $0.09 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6100 - 412 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
316
76.69902912621359%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
412
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
9.782608695652172%
Price, $
$379.91
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $379.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |