Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3054 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 82% better in War Thunder than FX-4350 - 238 vs 131 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
