Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2373 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4350 - 114 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$549.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 127 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |