Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 3873 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-4350 - 288 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
