Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 678 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $48.02 vs $549.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-5930K - $0.19 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-4300 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
250
98.4251968503937%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
8.755760368663596%
Price, $
$549.95
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |