Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 678 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $48.02 vs $429.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-5820K - $0.68 vs $4.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 46% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-4300 - 104 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
71
68.26923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.13/FPS
16.46489104116223%
Price, $
$429.95
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |