Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2589 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $48.02 vs $1555.0
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 108% better in Diablo IV than FX-4300 - 193 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 64 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76158 minutes ago
Buy for $1,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |