Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $48.02 vs $210.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.32 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13423 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13423 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |