Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2646 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $52.02 vs $1555.0
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76972 minutes ago
Buy for $1,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |