Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2505 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $52.02 vs $370.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 98% better in FIFA 23 than FX-4130 - 182 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Buy for $370 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |