Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2885 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $52.02 vs $179.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.24 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than FX-4130 - 228 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
213
93.42105263157895%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
30.379746835443033%
Price, $
$179.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |