Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2786 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4100 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |