Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 1590 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core Ultra 9 185H - 128 vs 22 threads
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 264% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7742 - 291 vs 80 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Rome | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 22 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
