Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than EPYC 7742 - 314 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |