Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 239 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 11% better in War Thunder than EPYC 7742 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 45 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |