Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 456 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 96 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7642 - 146 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 105 vs 225 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$294.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $294.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7642 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 12 |
96 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |