Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2023 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in Deathloop than EPYC 7551 - 206 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$579.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |