Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7551 - 120 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |