Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 1008 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 12% better in Dota 2 than EPYC 7551 - 209 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
![GIGABYTE [2020] AERO 15S OLED XB Thin+Light High Performance Laptop Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/laptops/B08DL8RP8C.jpg)
