Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 1155 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7551 - 102 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$77.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $77.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |