Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1412 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7551 - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Tiger Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |