Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1710 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 6% better in Valorant than FX-8320 - 727 vs 684 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 125 vs 180 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Naples | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |