Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 7443P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 234 days newer than EPYC 7443P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7443P - 126 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 125 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$173.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $173.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Milan | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
200 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |