Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 456 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than EPYC 7402 - 560 vs 530 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402 - 105 vs 180 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$294.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $294.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7402 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |