Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms EPYC 7313 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 234 days newer than EPYC 7313.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7313
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than EPYC 7313 - 274 vs 263 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7313 - 125 vs 155 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $273.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7313 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |