Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 70 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than EPYC 7302P - 226 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 45 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
