Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 392 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1165G7 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than EPYC 7302P - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
