Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 705 days newer than Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 7% better in League of Legends than Core i9-7940X - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 120 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7940X - 32 vs 28 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
168
93%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |