Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 73 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 120 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7282 - 134 vs 128 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$780
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $780 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Rome | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |