Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 239 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than EPYC 7282 - 789 vs 759 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
