Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than EPYC 7282 - 327 vs 295 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$294.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |