Key Differences
In short — Core i5-1145G7 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-1145G7 is 392 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-1145G7 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1145G7
- Performs up to 2% better in The Outer Worlds than EPYC 7282 - 207 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 28 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-1145G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-1145G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Tiger Lake-U |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
