Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2248 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than FX-9370 - 671 vs 605 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 120 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Rome | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 220 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |