Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms E-300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3550 days newer than E-300.
Advantages of AMD E-300
Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 18 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
Performs up to 63% better in League of Legends than E-300 - 1091 vs 671 FPS
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD E-300 - 12 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS in TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
E-300
Mobile • Aug 22nd, 2011
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD E-300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| E | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zacate | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| AMD Socket FT1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1499 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
18 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 40 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon HD 6310 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
