Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4810MQ outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4810MQ is 2130 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Athlon 3000G - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-4810MQ
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2014 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
