Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $98.79 vs $529.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10600 - $2.6 vs $9.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 50% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 57 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
38
66.66666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.3/FPS
27.956989247311824%
Price, $
$529.95
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
60.607979734008865%
Multi-Core
1975
31.983805668016196%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |